๐ง Content Originality Mind vs Tools

I donโt blindly rely on tools to audit the originality of the content. โ๐ ๏ธ
Yes, I use some custom AI agents to help me audit different aspects of content. ๐คโจ
But they donโt work by giving a score or percentage to decide if the content is original or not. โ๐
๐จโ๐ผ Human intervention is always present in my processes.
Because originality is not just about using unique sentences in the content. โ๏ธ
The same information can be expressed in hundreds of ways just by changing word sequences.
๐ Let's take an example:
- ๐ Being grateful can give your mood a big boost.
Now, the same sentence can be written in countless ways by simply changing the structure โ
but the information remains the same:
- โ Your mood can get a significant boost from being grateful.
- โ Gratitude can greatly enhance your mood.
- โ A big mood boost can come from being grateful.
- โ A major mood enhancement can result from being grateful.
๐ And the list goes onโฆ
โ ๏ธ The problem with content originality checking tools:
They might consider each sentence unique or original due to the difference in word sequences,
but in reality, they are far from being original.
โ An original content has:
- ๐ด Unique information connections in the document
- ๐ด Unique licensed images in a branded way
- ๐ด Unique and relevant research/statistics
- ๐ด Unique and highly accurate definitions
- ๐ด Unique suggestions and declarations
- ๐ด Unique answer terms
- ๐ด Unique context terms
- ๐ด Unique n-grams
- ๐ด And hundreds of other factors
๐ก The Right Approach:
To analyze the content based on these aspects, you should focus more on having a semantic mindset,
rather than just relying on tools.
๐ฎ Tools should be used with the mind, not against the mind.